Depending on how the court rules, agencies could be hamstring in any situation where they’re implementing regulations that address changing circumstances without waiting for the slow-moving process of congressional lawmaking. How the 6-3 Supreme Court resolves those cases could have implications for the executive branch’s power to act unilaterally not just on Covid-19. While the court has been tolerant so far of vaccine mandates that have come before it – refusing to halt requirements imposed by local and state entities – those implemented by the federal government pose new legal questions that could draw hostility from the conservative majority. Metropolitan Waterworks and Sewerage System Vs.A Supreme Court that has declined to block several types of vaccine mandates is now considering whether to allow the Biden administration to require millions of Americans to get Covid-19 vaccines. BarlisĬommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. CE Casecnan Water and Energy Company, Inc. The Province of Nueva Vizcaya, Provincial Treasurer of Nueva Vizcaya, Office of the Municipal Assessor and Treasurer Municipality of Alfonso Castaneda Province of Nueva Vizcaya Vs. Court of Tax Appeals (First Divsion), Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Bureau of Customs and Collector of Customs of the Port of BatangasĬommissioner of Customs Vs. Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation/Pilippinas Shell Petroleum Corporation Vs. Court of Tax Appeals (First Divsion) and Pilipinas Shell Petroleum Corporation/The Bureau of Customs and Collector of Customs of the Port of Batangas Vs. MCC Transport Singapore PTE, Ltd.Ĭommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. Yumex Philippines CorporationĬommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. Global Medical Center of Laguna, Inc.Ĭommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. Ross Systems International Inc./Ross Systems International, Inc. The City Government of Makati, the City Treasurer of Makati City and the Officer-in-Charge of the Office of the City Administrator and Head of Business Permits Office Commissioner of Internal RevenueĬommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. and the Commissionier of Internal RevenueĬommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. AIG Shared Services Corporation įederal Express Corporation Vs. Iringan in her capacity as Provicial TreasurerĬommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. The Provincial Governement of Cagayan, represented by Honorable Governor Alvaro T. Shoppers Paradise Realty & Development Corp., and Shoppers Paradise FTI Corporation Semirara Mining CorporationĬity Governement of Taguig Vs. The Secretary of Finance and the Commissioner of Customs Vs. Remigio, in his capacity as the Municipal Legal Officer Vs. Municipality of San Mateo, Isabela, represented by Municipal Mayor Crispina R. The Commissioner of Internal Revenue and the Officer-In-Charge-Assistant Commissioner, Large Taxpayers Service, in their Official capacities as officers of the Bureau on Internal RevenueĬommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. Philippines Mining Development Corporation Vs. Taganito Mining Corporation/Taganito Mining Corporation Vs. Ludo and Luym CorporationĬommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. Farm and Livestock, Inc.Ĭommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. The Bureau of Customs and the Commissioner of Customs Vs. Oriental Assurance Corporationĭepartment of Finance (DOF), represented by its Secretary and the Bureau of Internal Revenue (BIR) represented by its commissioner Vs. DulayĬommissioner of Internal Revenue Vs. Dominguez III and the Commissioner of Internal Revenue in the person of Caesar R. The Secretary of Finance in the person of Carlos G. Dulay, in his capacity as Commissioner of the Bureau of Internal Revenue and John Does and Jane Does, as person acting for, in behalf, or under the authority of respondents/Marco Polo Enterprises Limited, MG Universal Link Limited, OG Global Access Limited, Pride Fortune Limited, VIP Global Solutions Limited, AG Interpacific Resources Limited, Wanfang Technology Management Ltd., Imperial Choice Limited, Bestbetinet Limited, Riesling Capital Limited, Golden Dragon Empire Ltd., Oriental Game Limited, Most Success International Group Limited, and High Zone Capital Investment Group Limited Vs. Bureau of Internal Revenue, herein represented by Hon. Saint Wealth Ltd., as represented by David Buenaventura & Ang Law Offices Vs.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |